🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has repeatedly shown his desire to see critics probed, exerting influence on the Justice Department to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone further, it's damaging our reputation and credibility," the leader stated recently in a Truth Social post.

"They impeached twice, and indicted me (five times!)" he declared, referencing the multiple legal proceedings he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Each have since been indicted, in cases that many experts have stated appear to be driven by politics and difficult to win in court.

But the latest allegations against a Trump critic, former national security adviser John Bolton, differ significantly, legal specialists and ex-prosecutors say.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's charges to Comey's is like comparing two different things," said Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Details of Bolton's Legal Situation

Bolton has been criminally indicted on national allegations pertaining to the alleged mishandling of sensitive materials. After leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a outspoken presidential opponent, even to call him "stunningly uninformed" and unfit for the presidency in his book.

Experts contend that while there may be political motivations to target Bolton, the methods used to secure an indictment and the proof compiled against him suggest a possibly more substantial case than the Justice Department presented against Comey.

"This misconduct that's being alleged is both more serious and appears to have taken place over a considerable period of time," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his tenure as Trump's security advisor, and following his 2019 White House departure, authorities claimed that Bolton put the nation at danger by improperly retaining and transmitting sensitive documents to relatives using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the documents were labeled highly classified.

The charge alleges that at one point a unauthorized user gained access to Bolton's system where documents were stored and transmitted an seeming warning to cause "the largest scandal since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a hearing on Friday to 18 separate counts of improperly handling classified information.

Political Motivation or a Strong Case?

The timing of his indictment - coming on the tails of allegations against Comey - has renewed questions about political pressure on the justice system.

Trump once implied Bolton belonged in prison, and called him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his role, authored a book about his experience in the Trump administration that was sharply negative of the leader.

"There's no question that the timing of this indictment, when paired with additional cases, has prompted doubts about the strength of these charges, and why these counts are being filed now," said Jamil Jaffer, founder and director of the National Security Institute.

However, he added, "should the DOJ is able to demonstrate the allegations stated and demonstrate the material is properly classified, his behavior may certainly have violated the law".

Prosecuting such a high-ranking figure for improperly handling sensitive materials is "rare" but not unprecedented, noted Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that involve sensitive materials pose challenges to try, but they may and are filed against both low-level and high-level personnel, from occasionally," she explained.

Parallels to Examinations into Trump and Biden

Trump similarly faced charges of improperly storing sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and obstructing their recovery, but that case was ultimately thrown out by a federal judge and voided by his re-election as leader.

A independent investigator additionally found that ex-President Joe Biden wrongfully maintained sensitive materials from his period as vice president, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Trump's classified documents matters, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a top national security position at the DOJ.

Rigorous protocols regulate the management of sensitive materials. To secure a guilty verdict, the prosecution must prove that Bolton was aware the information he was transmitting was classified, and he had to knowingly transmit it to someone without authorization to obtain it.

"Because of the sensitive nature of the information at issue in this matter, we lack a lot of details about why the government contends elements like the diary entries and the additional information he shared by electronic message, and why there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A More Traditional Legal Action

The process by which the DOJ initiated this case will be closely examined, following Trump publicly expressed his desire to see his political opponents charged and some of those indictments materialized.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's case, prosecutors seem to have followed protocol.

"The Bolton prosecution and ultimately the charge appeared to have observed the standard procedure including the rules and norms within the Department of Justice," he stated.

Unlike Comey's short, concise charge, Bolton's was a more "traditional" document that "explicitly sets forth the particulars involving the circumstances and situation in this instance," Mr Lesko commented.

"It seems reasonably aligned with a long line of precedents... where government officials mishandled and transmitted classified material."