🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.